Cut to a few months ago: I received a notice in the mail
saying that if I haven’t served on a jury in the last six years, I am eligible
to regress back into the jury pool.
I wrote back, giving my address at the time of service and
the year in which I served (a little less than four years ago). In return I
received a summons for jury duty. Apparently, my name, my address at the time
of service, and my year of service wasn’t enough to help them narrow things down.
Never count on a bureaucrat to connect any dots (or to even have a pen for
the dot-connecting).
The juror website for my state offers no useful
info. for contacting someone to explain any of this, because if it provided this function, people would use it to
clear up the kinds of misunderstandings that lead to their being called to serve
on juries when they aren’t actually
eligible to serve on them. This is not an accident.
So I go to the Manhattan courthouse to explain this. I
brought my new summons, along with my original summons from 2007, the jury
questionnaire I filled out in 2007, and a paystub from 2007 showing my old
address. This would be enough documentation to get a home mortgage loan, a
lease on a pre-owned hovercraft, and an orphan from Darfur, so I figured it
would be more than enough to verify that I sat in a jury room for one day in
2007.
When I showed the woman at the courthouse my paperwork, she
acted like I’d handed her a used heroin needle. “No, you have to have your
original certificate of service!” Evidently every document related to said service
is irrelevant. I started to ask if she could just check with Queens (the county
I served in), but she interjected with “We have no way of checking the records
in Queens.”
Jury duty is spoken of as this sacred function, and in some
cases, the decisions made by juries are a matter of life and death. Yet the
databases of New York’s five boroughs lack the ability to communicate with each
other about the folks performing this sacred duty. It seems Lady Justice is
also blind to fax machines.
She gave me the number to call in Queens. I got someone on
the line and gave my name, my old address, and the date on which I served.
Within seconds, the woman in Queens was able to verify that I had served. I
then asked how I could obtain a new certificate of service to satisfy the
people in Manhattan. She said I could either go all the way out to the Queens
courthouse (Jamaica, Queens, which is only slightly closer than Jamaica the
island), or they could mail it to my old address. I told her I didn’t live
there anymore. She said they could only mail it to the old address. I tried to
ask if she could somehow communicate to Manhattan that Queens had a record of
my service. She said my only option was to trek all the way out to the Queens
courthouse to get a copy of the record. And of course, they don’t have evening
hours. Why make things at all workable for the people who are employed and pay
the taxes that keep courthouses operational in the first place?
So I go all the way out to
the Jamaica Queens courthouse. It takes about an hour to get there. After going
through security, I ask the guy where to go to obtain records. He sends me to a
spot on the other side of the courthouse. When I get there, the signs I see
give me a hunch that I’m in the wrong place. While on line I get on my cell and
call the Queens helpline to make sure I’m in the right place. They tell me to
go to the jury room for records. I head to the jury room. There are a handful
of jurors-to-be sitting around (I’m guessing everyone was at lunch), but not a
single official in sight. Literally not even one.
I walk back out and try to speak to a different security
guy. He cuts me off and gives me another room number. I go upstairs to this new
room; it’s marked as the room for jurors with questions. Not exactly what I was
asking for, but at least we’re getting warmer.
In this room there was a woman leaning against the counter.
She asked if she could help. As I started to explain why I was there, she cut
me off, pointed to a bench and said, “Someone will be with you.” Before I could
give any details, she just commanded me to sit…like I was a troubled dog on a troubled
dog reality show. So I sat on this bench. NO ONE ELSE WAS WAITING. No one. Just
me. There were probably 5 or 6 courthouse workers behind the desk
chit-chatting (I learned that one of them was trying to lose weight). I sat
there while the people behind the desk, who according to the signs, are there
to answer questions, did nothing.
They certainly weren’t answering any questions (except those related to their
co-worker's diet strategy).
Finally a guy appears and offers to help. I explain my
situation, and am again told to go to the jury room. I retreat back down the
stairs and trudge back to the jury room. Once again, not a single official in
sight. I started walking around in circles, thinking I must be missing
something. After making a few laps around the mostly empty room, I find a
little nook in the corner with an open door. I see two guys inside. I ask if
they can get my records. One of them says YES HE CAN. DING! DING! DING!
Some obvious: Why weren’t there lots of signs
identifying this as the records room? Why didn’t anyone on the phone or in
person tell me to look for this room within
the jury room? I can tell you its location wasn’t obvious.
The guy in this room was actually helpful, and I managed to
get two copies of my certificate of service.
I went all the way back to the Manhattan courthouse (another
hour-plus journey). I dealt with the same woman as before. I handed her my
certificate. She adopted a nagging tone and lobbed this at me: “Come next
August, you’ll be eligible again.”
Not: “Hey thanks for being patient with our embarrassingly outdated
process.”
Not: “Hey thanks for being honest enough to comply.”
Not: “Hey thanks for paying the skyhigh taxes that allow me
and my Kafka-villain colleagues to buy the paperwork we use to tapeworm your
time.”
Nope, just another rap on the knuckles as I walked out the
door. And we’re supposed to trust this system to make a sound judgment about
whom to execute?
No comments:
Post a Comment